Legal Opinion

City of Wyoming v. Minnesota Office of Administrative Hearings

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided July 24, 2007No. A06-1594Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DIETZEN, Judge.

Appellants City of Wyoming and Wyoming Township challenge the district court’s order denying their petition for a writ of mandamus compelling respondent Minnesota Office of Administrative Hearings (OAH) to order annexation of Wyoming Township into the City of Wyoming, arguing that the OAH is required by Minn. Stat. § 414.0325 (2006) to grant their petition. Because the district court properly applied the law and did not abuse its discretion, we affirm.

FACTS

Wyoming Township (Township) is located in Chisago County and is surrounded by the cities of Stacy, Wyoming, and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ashbacker Radio Corp. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Hyatt v. Anoka Police DepartmentSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
  3. State v. PeroSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  4. Breza v. City of MinnetristaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  5. Hagen v. State Civil Service BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API