Woodbine v. Van Horn
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.
W. H. Woodbine’s action for conversion is based upon a memorandum in writing signed by him and H. R. Van Horn concerning the sale of cord wood. As grounds for the reversal of the judgment in favor of Woodbine, Van Horn attacks the trial court’s construction of the agreement and also the measure applied in fixing the amount of damages.
The complaint is in four counts. The first count pleaded the writing as being in these words: “For and in consideration of the promises and agreement of the parties hereto, and of the moneys paid and to be paid as hereafter set out, H. R. Van Horn, hereby sells…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Universal Sales Corp. v. California Press Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1942
- Estate of PlattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Walsh v. WalshCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Mitau v. RoddanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Blackwood v. Cutting Packing Co.California Supreme Court · 1888
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by95 opinions
- Seely v. White Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
- Fibreboard Paper Products Corp. v. East Bay Union of MacHinists, Local 1304California Court of Appeal · 1964
- Warner Construction Corp. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Barham v. BarhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Coughlin v. BlairCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.