Legal Opinion
In re Facebook Privacy Litigation
District Court, N.D. California
Decided June 28, 2016No. Case No. 10-cv-02389-RMWPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*1055ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART FACEBOOK’S MOTION TO DISMISS
Re: Dkt. No. 243, 293
Ronald M. Whyte, United States District Judge
Plaintiffs Katherine Pohl and Wendy Marféo bring this putative class action against Facebook, Inc. for breach of contract and fraud. Facebook moves to dismiss for lack of Article III standing. Dkt. No. 243. Plaintiffs oppose the motion. Dkt. No. 270. Facebook filed a reply, and plaintiffs filed a surreply.1 Dkt. Nos. 281, 293-1. A hearing was held on December 18, 2015. Having considered the parties’ arguments, the court grants Facebook’s motion to dismiss…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Clapper v. Amnesty International USASupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Whitmore Ex Rel. Simmons v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Comcast Corp. v. BehrendSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Salmon Spawning & Recovery Alliance v. GutierrezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In re Facebook Internet Tracking LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2017
- Flodin v. Central Garden & Pet CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2024
- Gilman v. Intel CorporationDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2020
- N-N v. MayorkasDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2021
- Tamara Wareka v. Trusper Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2022
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.