Legal Opinion
In re Facebook Internet Tracking Litigation
District Court, N.D. California
Decided June 30, 2017No. Case No. 5:12-md-02314-EJDPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*840ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS
EDWARD J. DAVILA, United States District Judge
Plaintiffs allege that Defendant Face-book, Inc. violated their privacy by tracking their browsing activity on third-party websites. This Court previously granted Facebook’s motion to dismiss, with leave to amend, for lack of standing and failure to state a claim. Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint, and Facebook now moves to dismiss. Facebook’s motion will be GRANTED.
I. BACKGROUND
Facebook operates a social networking website.1 Second Am. Consolidated Class Action Compl. (“SAC”) ¶ 16, Dkt. No. 93.…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Navarro v. BlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Patel v. Facebook Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
- Williams v. Facebook, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
- (PS) Ward v. Department of Child Protective ServicesDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
- Archey v. Osmose Utilities Services, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2021
- Brodsky v. Apple Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.