Legal Opinion

Salmon Spawning & Recovery Alliance v. Gutierrez

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 8, 2008No. 06-35979PublishedCited by 134 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McKEOWN, Circuit Judge:

Wild salmon and steelhead, which are listed as threatened or endangered under the Endangered Species Act, have been the subject of much litigation in the federal courts. As they swim back and forth from the Pacific Northwest to Canada, the fish have no cognizance of an international boundary, or the Pacific Salmon Treaty of 1999 (“Treaty”), an effort by Canada and the United States to manage salmon populations originating in Alaska and the Pacific Northwest.

This appeal concerns whether three conservation groups have standing to challenge the decision of federal agencies…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Bender v. Williamsport Area School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. National Ass'n of Home Builders v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 2007

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by134 opinions

  1. Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors v. Hancock Park Capital II, L.P.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  2. Washington Environmental Counc v. Theodore SturdevantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  3. Cottonwood Environmental Law Center v. United States Forest ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  4. Wild Fish Conservancy v. SalazarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  5. WildEarth Guardians v. United States Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015

129 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API