Legal Opinion
Flodin v. Central Garden & Pet Company
District Court, N.D. California
Decided October 23, 2024No. 4:21-cv-01631Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 JOHN FLODIN, et al., Case No. 21-cv-01631-JST 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR 9 v. CLASS CERTIFICATION 10 CENTRAL GARDEN & PET COMPANY, Re: ECF Nos. 173, 187, 188, 189, 190 et al., 11 Defendants. 12 13 Plaintiffs John Flodin and Aaron Brand bring this putative class action against Defendants 14 Central Garden & Pet Company and Breeder’s Choice Pet Foods, Inc. (collectively, 15 “Defendants”), based on allegedly misleading representations regarding Defendants’ AvoDerm 16 dog and cat food products. Before the Court…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.