Legal Opinion

Tamara Wareka v. Trusper Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided July 28, 2022No. 3:21-cv-02682Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA TAMARA WAREKA, Case No. 21-cv-02682-VC Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING ANTI-SLAPP v. MOTION TO STRIKE TRUSPER’S COUNTERLCAIM TRUSPER INC., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 65 Defendants. Wareka’s Anti-SLAPP motion to strike Trusper’s counterclaim is denied, subject to renewal after the discovery period. Although Wareka has shown that Trusper’s counterclaim arises out of her First Amendment right to petition, Trusper has shown a probability of prevailing on the merits at this stage of litigation. Because discovery has not yet been conducted, the motion…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Planned Parenthood Federation v. Center for Medical ProgressCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  2. Navellier v. SlettenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  3. Olson v. ArnettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  4. Copenbarger v. Morris Cerullo World Evangelism, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  5. In re Facebook Privacy LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API