Legal Opinion
Wickstrom v. McGrath
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 10, 1927No. Docket No. 5317PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McLUCAS, J., pro tem.
T his is an action in unlawful detainer. Defendant appeals from the judgment.
Plaintiff and defendant entered into a written lease whereby the plaintiff leased to defendant a certain apartment building for the term of ten years, beginning November 1, 3923, at a total rental of $97,920, payable in monthly installments of $816 each. The lease contained the following provisions:
“Receipt is hereby acknowledged of the sum of $3,264.00, being in payment of the first, and last three months rents under this lease, of which said sum the amount of $2,488.00 being the amount of rent…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Burke v. NortonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Rez v. SummersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
- City Investment Co. v. PringleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- Mossi v. FairbanksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
- Parish v. StudebakerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
3Cited by11 opinions
- Samuels v. SingerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Garfinkle v. MontgomeryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Bank of America National trust & Savings Ass'n v. ButtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Universal Milk Co. v. WoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Moore v. Investment Properties Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.