Burke v. Norton
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment" of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. H. D. Gregory, Judge. Modified and affirmed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.
This is an action brought to recover rent, attorney’s fees, damages, and restoration of the premises held by the defendants, I. H. Norton, H. Joe Isaacs, and M. M. Norton, under a certain lease entered into by them with the plaintiff: on July 12, 1912, for a period of seven years and three months, commencing October 1, 1912, and ending December 31, 1919, at a total rental of $179,925, payable in certain installments. The defendants entered into possession of the premises, and either themselves, or by subtenant, remained in possession thereof until the filing of the suit.
Rent for the months of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Grommes v. St. Paul Trust Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1893
- Watson v. MerrillCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
- Wilcoxson v. StittCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- Belloc v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- McKee v. SoherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Lawrence Barker, Inc. v. BriggsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Puritan Leasing Co. v. AugustCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Yates v. ReidCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Simon v. KirkpatrickSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1927
- Wickstrom v. McGrathCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.