Parish v. Studebaker
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtJames, J.
Plaintiff brought this action to secure judgment of ejectment against the defendants; to recover certain specified rents, and to recover damages for the alleged unlawful withholding of the real property. The court made findings awarding plaintiff a money judgment, declined to make a judgment for the possession of the premises because at the time of the trial it appeared that such possession had been surrendered to the plaintiff, and, further, upon a cross-complaint and supplemental cross-complaint, allowed judgment to the defendants for a sum in excess of that demanded by the plaintiff. It is…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In re CurtisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Murphy v. Superior Court of Santa Clara CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Rez v. SummersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
- Van Bibber v. HiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- John Wigmore v. BuellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Forrester v. CookUtah Supreme Court · 1930
- Kelley v. Von HerbergWashington Supreme Court · 1935
- Brunswig Drug Co. v. SpringerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Servais v. KleinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- City Investment Co. v. PringleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.