Legal Opinion

City Investment Co. v. Pringle

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 28, 1925No. Docket No. 5112PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCashin, J.

An action commenced by City Investment Company, a Corporation, appellant herein, against Edward J. Pringle and Sidney J. Pringle, as executors of the last will and testament of William B. Pringle, deceased, the deceased being the original lessee of certain real property, Helmut Lewin and Herman Oppenheim, copartners, and others, sublessees of portions thereof, to recover rents unpaid by certain of the sublessees, the estate of deceased being insolvent.

Appellant is the owner of a certain building divided into storerooms fronting on Market and Eddy Streets in the city of San Francisco, a lease…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Scott v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Carr v. HamiltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  3. Nashville Trust Co. v. BankTennessee Supreme Court · 1892
  4. People v. Cal. Safe Deposit & Tr. Co.California Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Alvord v. BanfieldOregon Supreme Court · 1917

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Hartman Ranch Co. v. Associated Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Harrison v. AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Downey v. HumphreysCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  4. Samuels v. SingerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  5. Recorded Picture Co. [Prods.] Ltd. v. Nelson Entm't, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1997

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API