Legal Opinion

Samuels v. Singer

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 22, 1934No. Civ. 8781PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIS, J., pro tem.

This is an appeal on the judgment-roll by appellant, I. Pritsker, from a judgment in favor of respondent for the sum of $586, as value of use and occupation of certain premises, and for the further sum of $37.72, interest thereon from a certain date.

Appellant urges reversal on the ground that the complaint failed to state a cause of action. The amended complaint to which appellant answered after general demurrer was overruled is designated as one of “unlawful detainer”, and contains, among other allegations, those usual in such cases relative to treble rents, with a prayer…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Cox v. McLaughlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Luckey v. Superior Court of Los Angeles Cty.California Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Freeman v. Gray-Cowan, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Coburn v. GoodallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Hayden v. CollinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Cassinos v. Union Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1993
  2. People v. GustafsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  3. Recorded Picture Co. [Prods.] Ltd. v. Nelson Entm't, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1997
  4. Baugh v. Consumers Associates, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1966
  5. George v. Double-D Foods, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1984

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API