Legal Opinion
Garfinkle v. Montgomery
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 19, 1952No. Civ. 8055PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtVan Dyke, J.
Plaintiff and defendants alike have appealed from a judgment in an action for unlawful detainer brought by plaintiff, lessor, against defendants, lessees. Plaintiff leased a commercial building in Sacramento to the defendants for a term of 10 years beginning March 7, 1947. Pursuant to the terms of the lease the defendants paid to the lessor the sum of $2,700 which the lease provided should be turned over to the lessor as security for the performance of the covenants of the lease. The leased premises consisted of a store, a restaurant and a hotel.
The lessees defaulted in the payment of rent…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Blanc v. ConnorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Markham v. FralickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- California-Calaveras Mining Co. v. WallsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Woods-Drury, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- D'Amico v. RiedelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Day v. RosenthalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Knowles v. RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Briggs v. Electronic Memories & Magnetics Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1975
- Wood v. HersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Fontana Industries, Inc. v. Western Grain & Fertilizer Co.California Court of Appeal · 1959
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.