Legal Opinion
City of University Heights v. O'Leary
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided December 16, 1981No. 80-1716PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKrupansky, J.
The sole issue presented in the instant' cause is whether Sections 626.04(a) and 626.09(a) of the Codified Ordinances of University Heights are constitutional. For the reasons expressed below, we hold these sections constitutional and we reverse the Court of Appeals’ holding to the contrary.
Chapter 626 of the Codified Ordinances of the city of University Heights contains a comprehensive firearm registration law.2 The two sections challenged in this cause provide:
“626.04 IDENTIFICATION CARD REQUIRED
“(a) No person shall purchase, own, possess, receive, have *132on or about his person or use any…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. DotterweichSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Lambert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- United States v. FreedSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. BalintSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- United States v. International Minerals & Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Arnold v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Klein v. LeisOhio Supreme Court · 2003
- In re D.B.Ohio Supreme Court · 2011
- City of Cleveland v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 2010
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.