Legal Opinion

United States v. Freed

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 5, 1971No. 345PublishedCited by 641 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Douglas

Following our decision in Haynes v. United States, 390 U. S. 85, Congress revised the National Firearms Act with the view of eliminating the defects in it which were revealed in Haynes.1

At the time of Haynes “only weapons used principally by persons engaged in unlawful activities would be subjected to taxation.” Id., at 87. Under the Act, as amended, all possessors of firearms as defined in the Act2 *603are covered, except the Federal Government. 26 U. S. C. § 5841 (1964 ed., Supp. V).

At the time of Haynes any possessor of a weapon included in the Act was compelled to disclose the fact of his…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  3. Murphy v. Waterfront Commission of New York HarborSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Marchetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. United States v. DotterweichSupreme Court of the United States · 1943

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by641 opinions

  1. Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Rehaif v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  3. Staples v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Liparota v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

636 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API