Legal Opinion

Arnold v. City of Cleveland

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 11, 1993No. 92-105PublishedCited by 230 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.

The underlying issue in this appeal concerns the constitutionality of an ordinance which bans the possession and sale of “assault weapons” in the city of Cleveland. Appellants challenge this legislation on essentially two grounds. First, appellants contend that the ordinance is an overbroad restriction on their constitutional right to bear arms and defend themselves and, thus, is in violation of Sections 1 and 4, Article I of the Ohio Constitution. Second, appellants maintain that the ordinance violates the Supremacy Clause of the federal Constitution.

I

A

Presumption of Constitutionality

In…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by230 opinions

  1. State v. RobinetteOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Painter v. GraleyOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State v. GardnerOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  4. State v. FarrisOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  5. State v. BoczarOhio Supreme Court · 2007

225 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API