State v. Thompkins

Francis E. Sweeney, Sr., J.

At issue is the validity of R.C. 2925.03(M), 2925.11(F)(1) and 2925.23(H),1 which mandate driver’s license suspensions upon conviction for drug offenses. Each appellant in this consolidated appeal was subject to one of the three cited statutes. The appellants challenge the constitu*560tionality of these statutes on due process and equal protection grounds.2 For the following reasons, we reject their challenges. Accordingly, we affirm the judgments of the court of appeals.

We begin our discussion with the premise that all statutes are presumed constitutional. The party…