Legal Opinion

City of Cleveland v. State

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 2010No. 2009-2280PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLundberg Stratton, J.

{¶ 1} Today this court must decide whether R.C. 9.68, a statute enacted by the General Assembly in 2006 that provides that only federal or state regulations can limit an Ohioan’s individual right to bear arms, is a general law. We hold that R.C. 9.68 is a general law that displaces municipal firearm ordinances and does not unconstitutionally infringe on municipal home rule authority.

I. Procedural History

{¶ 2} In 2006, the General Assembly enacted R.C. 9.68 as a component of Sub.H.B. No. 347, effective March 14, 2007, recognizing that the right to keep and bear arms is a “fundamental…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Arnold v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Sorin v. Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Canton v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Mendenhall v. City of AkronOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  5. American Financial Services Ass'n v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 2006

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Boles v. KnabOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Clifton v. Village of BlanchesterOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Dayton v. State (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Riverside v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
  5. State ex rel. Evans v. McGrath (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API