City of Cleveland v. State
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLundberg Stratton, J.
{¶ 1} Today this court must decide whether R.C. 9.68, a statute enacted by the General Assembly in 2006 that provides that only federal or state regulations can limit an Ohioan’s individual right to bear arms, is a general law. We hold that R.C. 9.68 is a general law that displaces municipal firearm ordinances and does not unconstitutionally infringe on municipal home rule authority.
I. Procedural History
{¶ 2} In 2006, the General Assembly enacted R.C. 9.68 as a component of Sub.H.B. No. 347, effective March 14, 2007, recognizing that the right to keep and bear arms is a “fundamental…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Arnold v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1993
- Sorin v. Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1976
- Canton v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- Mendenhall v. City of AkronOhio Supreme Court · 2008
- American Financial Services Ass'n v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 2006
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Boles v. KnabOhio Supreme Court · 2011
- Clifton v. Village of BlanchesterOhio Supreme Court · 2012
- Dayton v. State (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017
- Riverside v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
- State ex rel. Evans v. McGrath (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.