Legal Opinion
Murnick v. Asbury Park
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided November 24, 1982PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
187 N.J. Super. 455 (1982)
455 A.2d 504
THEODORE MURNICK AND MAXINE MURNICK, HIS WIFE, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,
v.
CITY OF ASBURY PARK, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued October 26, 1982.
Decided November 24, 1982.
Before Judges BOTTER, POLOW and BRODY.
Edward G. Rosenblum argued the cause for appellant (Rosenblum & Rosenblum, attorneys; Edward G. Rosenblum of counsel and on the brief).
Carl G. Weisenfeld argued the cause for respondents (Hannoch, Weisman, Stern, Besser, Berkowitz & Kinney, attorneys; Carl G. Weisenfeld of counsel and on the brief).
The opinion…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In Re the Appeals of Kents 2124 Atlantic Ave., Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
- Howard Savings Institution v. KielbSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1962
- Piscataway Assoc., Inc. v. Township of PiscatawaySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1977
- Franklin Estates, Inc. v. Tp. of EdisonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
- Murnick v. City of Asbury ParkNew Jersey Tax Court · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Murnick v. City of Asbury ParkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
- Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Borough of ClosterNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1983
- Lawrence Associates v. Lawrence TownshipNew Jersey Tax Court · 1983
- Sage v. Bernards TownshipNew Jersey Tax Court · 1982
- Berkley Arms Apartment Corp. v. Hackensack CityNew Jersey Tax Court · 1983
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.