Legal Opinion
Murnick v. City of Asbury Park
New Jersey Tax Court
Decided February 3, 1981PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ANDREW, J. T. C.
In this local property tax proceeding, plaintiffs seek a reduction in their assessment for the tax years of 1977, 1978 and 1979 on the basis that the assessment is in excess of true value. Plaintiffs also contend there is a lack of a common level of assessment in the taxing district, therefore the sales-assessment ratios promulgated by the Director of the Division of Taxation should be applied to afford relief from inequality in assessment. In re Appeal of Kents, 2124 Atlantic Ave., Inc., 34 N.J. 21, 166 A.2d 763 (1961). The assessment which was affirmed by the Monmouth County…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- City of New Brunswick v. State of New Jersey Division of Tax AppealsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1963
- In Re the Appeals of Kents 2124 Atlantic Ave., Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
- Aetna Life Insurance Co. v. City of NewarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- Rek Investment Co. v. City of NewarkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963
- Middlesex Builders, Inc. v. Township of Old BridgeNew Jersey Tax Court · 1980
3Cited by22 opinions
- Murnick v. City of Asbury ParkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
- Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Borough of ClosterNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1983
- Lawrence Associates v. Lawrence TownshipNew Jersey Tax Court · 1983
- Devonshire Development Associates v. City of HackensackNew Jersey Tax Court · 1981
- Murnick v. Asbury ParkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.