Legal Opinion

Howard Savings Institution v. Kielb

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 29, 1962PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Haneman, J.

Appeal is herein taken from a judgment of the Superior Court, Chancery Division, declaring that certain bank accounts in the form “Eva Kielb in trust for Walter Kielb, Jr.” vested no ownership in the named beneficiary upon the depositor-trustee’s death but, on the contrary, were to be administered as part of the depositor-trustee’s estate.

The controversy originated in an application by The Howard Savings Institution for a construction of the will of one Eva Kielb under which will plaintiff had qualified as executor and trustee. Testatrix…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re the Accounting of TottenNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
  2. City of New Port Richey v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of MarylandCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1939

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. State, Dept. of Environ. Protect. v. Ventron Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
  2. Gibbons v. GibbonsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
  3. In Re Freshwater Wetlands Protection Act RulesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2004
  4. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. v. GlaserNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
  5. Container Ring Co. v. DirectorNew Jersey Tax Court · 1980

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API