Legal Opinion
Berkley Arms Apartment Corp. v. Hackensack City
New Jersey Tax Court
Decided December 15, 1983PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EVERS, J.T.C.
The issues presented in this real property tax matter are voluminous but all stem from the claim of Berkley Arms Apartment Corp., a cooperative corporation, (hereafter taxpayer) that its mid-rise apartment structure was over-assessed in 1982 by the City of Hackensack, (hereafter city). Also raised were issues concerning discrimination in the assessment, taxpayer’s rights of equal protection, the constitutionality of N.J.S.A. 54:2-391 (which conditions the prosecution of real property tax appeals on the payment of taxes), and of N.J.S.A. 54:3-27.2 *264(which generally provides for…
2Cases cited79 opinions
- United States v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- City of New Brunswick v. State of New Jersey Division of Tax AppealsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1963
- In Re the Appeals of Kents 2124 Atlantic Ave., Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
- Donadio v. CunninghamSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1971
- Hackensack Water Co. v. Division of Tax AppealsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Ford Motor Co. v. Edison TownshipNew Jersey Tax Court · 1988
- Schwam v. Township of Cedar GroveNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988
- Hull Junction Holding Corp. v. Princeton BoroughNew Jersey Tax Court · 1996
- West Milford Tp. v. Van DeckerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989
- Linwood Properties, Inc. v. Fort Lee BoroughNew Jersey Tax Court · 1985
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.