Legal Opinion
Murnick v. City of Asbury Park
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided February 27, 1984PublishedCited by 66 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
POLLOCK, J.
At issue on this appeal is the constitutionality of N.J.S.A. 54:1-35a and N.J.S.A. 54:2-40.4 (commonly known as “chapter 123”) under art. VIII, § 1, para. 1(a) of the New Jersey Constitution, which mandates that real property be assessed according to a uniform standard of value. Resolution of that issue involves determining whether chapter 123 provides the exclusive form of relief from a claim of property tax discrimination.
The Tax Court found that chapter 123 was not exclusive, and that the taxpayers, Theodore and Maxine Murnick, were…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- In Re the Appeals of Kents 2124 Atlantic Ave., Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
- Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Borough of ClosterNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1983
- Piscataway Assoc., Inc. v. Township of PiscatawaySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1977
- Continental Paper Co. v. Vil. Ridgefield Pk.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973
- Siegal v. City of NewarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1962
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- F.M.C. Stores Co. v. Borough of Morris PlainsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
- Ford Motor Co. v. Township of EdisonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
- Glen Wall Associates v. Township of WallSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
- GLENPOINTE ASS'N. v. Tp. of TeaneckNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1990
- Schumm v. BergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.