Legal Opinion

Connie A. Nagrampa v. Mailcoups, Inc. The American Arbitration Association

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 4, 2006No. 03-15955PublishedCited by 1,126 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Judge WARDLAW; Partial concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge CLIFTON; Dissent by Judge O’Scannlain; Dissent by Judge KOZINSKI

OPINION

WARDLAW, Circuit Judge,

with whom Chief Judge SCHROEDER, Judges REINHARDT, THOMAS, GRABER, FISHER, and GOULD join, and with whom Judge CLIFTON joins as to Part II-A and II-B.

The question before us is whether a provision to submit to arbitration in a written franchise agreement is valid and enforceable, therefore requiring the district court to stay proceedings and refer the disputed franchise agreement to arbitration under the Federal Arbitration Act…

2Cases cited78 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1,126 opinions

  1. Dependable Highway Express, Inc. v. Navigators Ins.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  2. Landstar Ranger, Inc. v. PARTH ENTERPRISES, INC.District Court, C.D. California · 2010
  3. Cox v. Ocean View Hotel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  4. Mohamed v. Uber Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  5. Awuah v. Coverall North America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009

1,121 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API