Legal Opinion
Cox v. Ocean View Hotel Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 23, 2008No. 06-15903PublishedCited by 189 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge TASHIMA; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge O’SCANNLAIN.
*1117TASHIMA, Circuit Judge:
Ocean View Hotel Corporation (“Ocean View”) and Thomas Cox executed an employment agreement containing a mandatory arbitration clause. When a dispute arose during the course of employment, Cox wrote a letter to Ocean View requesting arbitration, but Ocean View responded by telling Cox that it did not consider his claim ripe for arbitration. Following termination of his employment, Cox filed a complaint in the Circuit Court of Hawai’i. At that point, Ocean View decided that it wanted…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. LivingstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Howsam v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. CardegnaSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by189 opinions
- Kevin Nguyen v. Barnes & Noble Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Paige Martin v. Gary YasudaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Michael Ashbey v. Archstone Property ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Bridge Fund Capital Corp. v. Fastbucks Franchise Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Mundi v. Union Security Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
184 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.