Legal Opinion
Mohamed v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 7, 2016No. 15-16178, No. 15-16181, No. 15-16250PublishedCited by 176 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The opinion filed on September 7, 2016, is hereby amended as follows:
1. On page 18 of the slip opinion, in footnote 6, the last sentence (and related citations) should be deleted.
We note that Plaintiffs also raised the argument that the class and collective action waivers in the arbitration agreements may violate the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) for the first time in a sur-reply. That untimely submission waived the argument. See, e.g., United States v. Dreyer, 804 F.3d 1266, 1277 (9th Cir. 2015) (“Generally, an appellee waives any argument it fails to raise in its answering…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Howsam v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Miller v. GammieCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Connie A. Nagrampa v. Mailcoups, Inc. The American Arbitration AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Armendariz v. Found. Health Psychcare Servs., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by176 opinions
- Sloan v. Gen. Motors LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2018
- Kai Peng v. Uber Technologies, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2017
- Alexia Herrera v. Zumiez, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Mumin v. Uber Technologies, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2017
- Munro v. Univ. of S. Cal.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
171 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.