Plywood & Door Southern Corp. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Richardson, Judge:
The merchandise of these protests, consolidated for trial, consists of plywood imported at Houston, Texas, from Finland, and advanced in value upon appraisement. Plaintiff contends that liquidation of the covering entries is invalid because notice of appraisement was not given as required by law. Defendant contends that notice of appraisenient was given, and further, that plaintiff has failed to prove non-delivery of such notice.
The applicable statutory and regulatory provisions governing notice of appraisement are set forth in 19 U.S.C.A., section 1501 (section 501, *310Tariff…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States ex rel. Helmecke v. RiceDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1922
- Peabody v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
- United States v. Frank & LambertCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
- Orlex Dyes & Chemicals Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
- Clayton Chemical & Packaging Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Intra-Mar Shipping Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
- Delaware Watch Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
- Atteberry v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2003
- Getz Bros. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967