Legal Opinion

Atteberry v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided May 14, 2003No. Slip Op. 03-53; Court 02-00647PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RIDGWAY, Judge.

The United States (“Government”) has moved to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction this action in which plaintiff Daniel Atteberry (“Importer”) contests the decision of the United States Customs Service (“Customs”) 1 re-classifying for tariff purposes certain merchandise which he describes as “bike[s]/kart[s]/scooter[s].” Specifically, the Government’s motion contends that this action is untimely under 28 U.S.C. § 2686(a)(1) (2000), because it was assertedly filed more than 180 days after the mailing of Customs’ notice of denial of the Importer’s protest…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Rosenthal v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  4. Huntley v. WhittierMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
  5. Charlson Realty Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Butler v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
  2. Atteberry v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API