Legal Opinion

Peabody v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided November 4, 1924No. 2327PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHatfield, Judge

This is an appeal from the judgment of the Board of General Appraisers, dismissing the petition of the appellants for remission of additional duties filed under section 489 of the tariff act of 1922, and involves the construction of section 501, and section 489, and the rules adopted and promulgated by the Board of General Appraisers in pursuance to the provisions thereof.

Section 489 of the tariff act of 1922, in so far as the same is pertinent to the issues in this case, reads as folio-ws:.Sec. 489. * * * Such additional duties shall not be construed to be penal and shall not be remitted nor…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. The Lace House v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1905
  2. United States v. Independent Importing Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1908

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. United States v. Tampa Box Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  2. Ti Hang Lung & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1939
  3. Alfred Dunhill of London, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1949
  4. Nippon Dry Goods Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1943
  5. Thalson Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API