Legal Opinion

Orlex Dyes & Chemicals Corp. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided November 3, 1958No. C. D. 2036PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Richardson, Judge:

This action arises by way of protest. The merchandise involved (sodium trichloracetate) was entered at the port of New Orleans, La., on February 12, 1954. It was apparently appraised on April 12, 1955. The covering entry was liquidated by the collector of customs on August 16, 1955.

The claim is made in the protest that the “appraisement of said merchandise and liquidation of customs entry pursuant thereto were illegal, null and void, since no notice on Customs Form 4301 was made to the importer of record, stating therein that the appraised value exceeds the entered value.”

19…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States ex rel. Helmecke v. RiceDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1922
  2. Clayton Chemical & Packaging Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
  3. The Employers' Liability Assurance Corporation, Ltd. v. M. D. A. Maes, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1956
  4. C. S. Emery & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1943
  5. D. C. Andrews & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Leasing Associates, Inc. v. Slaughter & Son, Inc., and F. E. Slaughter, as GuarantorCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971
  2. United States v. WolfsonDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1971
  3. Astra Trading Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964
  4. Compass Instrument & Optical Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
  5. Schayer v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API