Legal Opinion

Clayton Chemical & Packaging Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided March 26, 1957No. Reap. Dec. 8774; Entry No. 635PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MollisoN, Judge:

When this appeal for reappraisement was called for trial, counsel for the defendant moved that it be dismissed as untimely, pointing out that the copy of the notice of appraisement, customs Form 4301, transmitted with the official papers by the collector and received in evidence as defendant’s exhibit A, bears a notation that the original of such notice was mailed on November 8, 1954, whereas the appeal for reappraisement was not received in the collector’s office until March 7, 1955.

Section 501 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, provides that—

* * * The decision of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States ex rel. Helmecke v. RiceDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1922
  2. Alfred Dunhill of London, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1949
  3. The Lace House v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1905

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. United States v. WolfsonDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1971
  2. Orlex Dyes & Chemicals Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
  3. Astra Trading Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964
  4. Compass Instrument & Optical Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
  5. Schayer v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API