People v. Goodard
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sacramento County. C. 0. Busick, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
The action was brought under the Red-light Abatement Act to abate a nuisance alleged to have been maintained in premises in the city of Sacramento owned by the defendant. It was decreed that defendant be perpetually enjoined from conducting said premises “for the purpose of acts of lewdness, assignation, and prostitution” and the premises were ordered closed for the period of one year. Defendant appeals from the judgment.
The contention of appellant that the judgment is not sustained by the findings and that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the findings may be considered together.
The…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- McCarthy v. Gaston Ridge Mill & Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1904
- State ex rel. Kern v. JeromeWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- People v. DillmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
- Gilbert v. PeckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- People Ex Rel. Bradford v. BurchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Hicks v. Sarong GalsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- People Ex Rel. Van De Kamp v. American Art Enterprises, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1983
- People ex rel. Gwinn v. KothariCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- United States v. MargolisDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1923
- Martin v. State Ex Rel. EidsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1931
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.