People Ex Rel. Bradford v. Burch
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
The action was brought under the “Red-light Abatement Law,” the property affected being a one-story brick building known as No. 119 K Street, in the city of Sacramento. The property was owned by the estate of Mary Sweeney, deceased, and Charles T. Burch was the owner of the personal property situated in the premises, which were known as the Casino Theater and Dance Hall. The judgment enjoined the use of the premises “for the purpose of acts of lewdness,” directed the sheriff to close the building and keep it closed for one year, and also directed him to remove and sell all of the furniture,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Tingley v. Times Mirror Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
- Douglass v. TouseyNew York Supreme Court · 1829
- State v. CarrollSupreme Court of Iowa · 1892
- People v. DillmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
- People v. PetersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Hill v. HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Spenard Action Committee v. Lot 3, Block 1, Evergreen SubdivisionAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
- People Ex Rel. Van De Kamp v. American Art Enterprises, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1983
- People ex rel. Gwinn v. KothariCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- People v. GoodardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.