Legal Opinion

People Ex Rel. Van De Kamp v. American Art Enterprises, Inc.

California Supreme Court

Decided January 31, 1983No. L.A. 31520PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KAUS, J.

This case presents a narrow question of statutory interpretation: do the current provisions of the Red Light Abatement Law (Pen. Code, §§ 11225-11235)1—the act—authorize an award of damages against an owner of property that has been used for purposes prohibited by the act? Because such damages are not included among the sanctions specifically enumerated in the act, and because past authorities establish that the primary purpose of the act is to “reform” the property in question rather than to punish the property owner, we conclude that the act does not authorize such a damage…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. People v. ShueyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  3. People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Grant v. WeatherholtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  5. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. KyleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. County of Santa Clara v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Court of Appeal · 2006
  2. Granberry v. Islay InvestmentsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Thompson Pacific Construction Inc. v. City of SunnyvaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  4. Mitchell v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  5. County of San Luis Obispo v. Abalone AllianceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API