Legal Opinion
People Ex Rel. Hicks v. Sarong Gals
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 18, 1974No. Civ. 13235PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KAUFMAN, J.
“Sarong Gals,” Seemaygro, Inc. (“Seemaygro”) and Norma Groat appeal from a judgment which permanently enjoined them and any other person from maintaining, using or occupying the premises known as Sarong Gals for the purpose of lewdness and which closed the premises to all uses for one year except for uses not involving entertainment or use of a Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control license.
The underlying facts of this case are set forth in our prior opinion, People ex rel. Hicks v. Sarong Gals, 27 Cal.App.3d 46 [103 Cal.Rptr. 414], where we held that the Red Light…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Estate of Bristol v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Foreman & Clark Corp. v. FallonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Nestle v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- In Re GianniniCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Consolidated Rock Products Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Busch v. Projection Room TheaterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. MOTION PICTURE ENTITLED" THE BET"Supreme Court of Kansas · 1976
- State v. A Motion Picture Entitled "The Bet"Supreme Court of Kansas · 1976
- State ex rel. Kidwell v. U. S. Marketing, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1981
- People Ex Rel. Van De Kamp v. American Art Enterprises, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1983
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.