Wilson v. Horton Motor Lines, Inc.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtScheNCK, J.
“All persons having an interest in the subject of the action and in obtaining the relief demanded may be joined as plaintiffs, either jointly, severally, or in the alternative. . . .” C. S., 455. The individual plaintiff had “an interest in the subject of the action” for that he owned the truck and the trailer alleged to have been damaged; and the corporate plaintiff had “an interest in the subject of the action” by reason of its lien upon said damaged truck.
“The plaintiff may unite in the same complaint several causes of action, of legal or equitable nature, or both, where they all arise out…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Elam v. . BarnesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
- Scott v. Ætna Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
- Griffin v. Bank of ColeridgeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
3Cited by14 opinions
- McKinley v. HinnantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- Patterson v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- Duke v. CampbellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Reliable Trucking Co. v. PayneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Federal Land Bank of Columbia v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.