Legal Opinion

Scott v. Ætna Life Insurance

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 28, 1933PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnor, J.

In Hoke v. Glenn, 167 N. C., 594, 83 S. E., 807, it is said: “It is the purpose of the Code system of pleading, which prevails with us, to have actions tried upon their merits, and to that end pleadings are construed liberally, every intendment is adopted in behalf of the pleader, and a complaint cannot be overthrown by a demurrer unless it be wholly insufficient. If in any portion of it, or to any extent, it presents facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, or if facts sufficient for that purpose can be fairly gathered from it, the pleading will stand, however inartificially it may…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Richards v. Travelers Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Hoke v. . GlennSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  3. Cole v. WagnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  4. Cole v. . WagnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  5. State Ex Rel. North Carolina Corp. Commission v. Harnett County Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1926

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Beacon Homes, Inc. v. HoltSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  2. Patterson v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  3. Wilson v. Horton Motor Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  4. Lipe v. Citizens Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  5. Pearce v. . PrivetteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API