Duke v. Campbell
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtWiNBORNE, J.
The sole assignment of error presented for consideration on this appeal is based upon exception to the ruling of the court in sustaining the demurrer filed by plaintiff' as shown in the record. This exception raises the question as to whether error in law appears upon the face of the record, Culbreth v. Britt, 231 N.C. 76, 56 S.E. 2d 15, and cases there cited. See also Gibson v. Ins. Co., 232 N.C. 712, and cases cited. And where error is manifest on the face of the record, it is the duty of the Court to correct it, and it may do so of its own motion, that is, ex mero motu. See Gibson v. Ins.…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Gibson v. Central Manufacturers' Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Culbreth v. Britt Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- Love v. Commissioners of Chatham CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1870
- George v. . HighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
- Ransom v. . McCleesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1870
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Pratt v. BishopSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- EL LOWIE & COMPANY v. AtkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- Convent of the Sisters of Saint Joseph of Chestnut Hill v. City of Winston-SalemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- McKinley v. HinnantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- State v. CorlSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.