Legal Opinion

Federal Land Bank of Columbia v. Jones

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 17, 1937PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stacy, O. J.

Can a mortgagee, after default and before foreclosure, maintain an action for trespass against one who has tortiously injured the mortgaged estate? The answer is, “Yes.”

At the time of ponding water on the mortgaged premises, the plaintiff, as mortgagee after default, was entitled to possession. Weathersbee v. Goodwin, 175 N. C., 234, 95 S. E., 491; Kiser v. Combs, 114 N. C., 640, 19 S. E., 664; Coor v. Smith, 101 N. C., 261, 7 S. E., 669; Capehart v. Dettrick, 91 N. C., 344; Bruner v. Threadgill, 88 N. C., 361; Wittkowski v. Watkins, 84 N. C., 457; Cunningham v. Davis, 42 N. C.,…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Stevens v. TurlingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  2. Capehart v. . DettrickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
  3. Gorrell v. AlspaughSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
  4. Bruner v. . ThreadgillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
  5. Harris v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1925

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Brannock v. FletcherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. Gregg v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  3. Cleve v. . AdamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  4. H. L. Vollers Co. v. ToddSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  5. Farmers Bank of Sunbury v. City of Elizabeth CityCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API