Legal Opinion

Patterson v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 4, 1966No. 293PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLake, J.

Upon a demurrer to a complaint for the reason that it fails to state a cause of action, the complaint must be construed as a whole, every reasonable intendment and presumption must be made in favor of the plaintiff and if, when it is so construed, facts sufficient to state a cause of action upon any theory are alleged therein, or may logically be inferred from the allegations thereof, the complaint must be sustained and the demurrer overruled. Hargrave v. Gardner, 264 N.C. 117, 141 S.E. 2d 36; Wilson v. Motor Lines, 207 N.C. 263, 176 S.E. 750; Scott v. Insurance Co., 205 N.C. 38, 169 S.E.…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Hoke v. . GlennSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  2. McNeely Ex Rel. McNeely v. WaltersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  3. GENERAL AIR CONDITIONING COMPANY v. DouglassSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  4. Trollinger v. . FleerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  5. Steele v. Locke Cotton Mills Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1950

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. North Carolina Milk Commission v. National Food Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. Theis v. duPont, Glore Forgan Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  3. Investment Properties of Asheville, Inc. v. AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  4. Bolton Corp. v. T. A. Loving Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  5. State Ex Rel. Gilchrist v. HurleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API