Legal Opinion

Griffin v. Bank of Coleridge

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 11, 1933PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStagy, C. J.

The defendants have appealed three times from as many judgments in the same case.

As the demurrer, interposed by the defendants at the hearing in Sanford, and renewed here, does not “distinctly specify the grounds of objection to the complaint,” it might well have been disregarded (C. S., 512), or treated as a motion to dismiss (Elam. v. Barnes, 110 N. C., 73, 14 S. E., 621), from the refusal of which no appeal lies. Plemmons v. Improvement Co., 108 N. C., 614, 13 S. E., 188.

“A motion to dismiss for want of jurisdiction or because the complaint does not state a cause of action is not such a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Plemmons v. Southern Improvement Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
  2. Combes v. . AdamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  3. Joyner v. . RobertsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
  4. Burrell v. . HughesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
  5. Elam v. . BarnesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Guilford Realty & Insurance Co. v. Blythe Bros. Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  2. Duke v. CampbellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  3. Wilson v. Horton Motor Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  4. Adams v. Flora MacDonald CollegeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  5. Oliver v. . Hood, Comr. of BanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API