Nodak Mutual Insurance Co. v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVIES, Judge.
On appeal from summary judgment for Nodak Mutual Insurance Company (Nodak), American Family Insurance Company (American Family) challenges the district court’s determination that Minnesota law governs a subrogation dispute arising from an accident in North Dakota. We reverse.
FACTS
In November 1993, the automobiles of David Blumer, a North Dakota resident, and Gracey Morey, a Minnesota resident, collided in North Dakota, near the Minnesota border. Blumer’s car was registered and licensed in North Dakota and insured by Nodak under a policy issued in North Dakota, while…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Allstate Insurance v. HagueSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Milkovich v. SaariSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- Jepson v. General Casualty Co. of WisconsinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
- Myers v. Government Employees Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Nodak Mutual Insurance Co. v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Healey v. I-Flow, LLCDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2012
- Schumacher v. SchumacherCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
- Christian v. BirchCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
- Glover v. Merck & Co., Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2004
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.