Legal Opinion

Milkovich v. Saari

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 5, 1973No. 43667PublishedCited by 154 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Todd, Justice.

Defendants appeal from an order of the trial court denying their motion to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint for failure to state a cause of action because the law of Ontario, where plaintiff and defendants reside, has a guest statute requiring proof of gross negligence, which was not alleged. Defendants further appeal from the granting of plaintiff’s motion to strike their affirmative defense that the law of Ontario should apply. The trial court certified the question as important and doubtful. We affirm.

Plaintiff and both defendants are residents of Thunder Bay (formerly Port…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Babcock v. JacksonNew York Court of Appeals · 1963
  2. Clark v. ClarkSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1966
  3. Wilcox v. WilcoxWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Heath v. ZellmerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Balts v. BaltsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by154 opinions

  1. Allstate Insurance v. HagueSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Gutierrez v. CollinsTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Bishop v. Florida Specialty Paint Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1980
  4. Northwest Airlines, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation v. Astraea Aviation Services, Inc., Doing Business as Dalfort Aviation, a Texas CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
  5. Jepson v. General Casualty Co. of WisconsinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994

149 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API