Legal Opinion
Christian v. Birch
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided March 24, 2009No. A08-0312PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LARKIN, Judge.
Appellant challenges the district court’s award of summary judgment, arguing that the district court erred in its determination that (1) Wisconsin’s statute of limitations governs the underlying lawsuit and bars appellant’s claims as untimely and (2) Minnesota lacks personal jurisdiction over respondent. Because Minnesota’s statute of limitations governs the underlying lawsuit, and because Minnesota may exercise personal jurisdiction over respondent consistent with federal due process, we reverse and remand.
FACTS
For the purpose of the district court’s summary judgment…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Burnham v. Superior Court of Cal., County of MarinSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Joseph H. Whitney v. The Guys, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
- Healey v. I-Flow, LLCDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2012
- Aquilar v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2018
- Mid-Continent Engineering, Inc. v. Toyoda MacHinery USA, Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2009
- Whitney v. Guys, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2014
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.