Schumacher v. Schumacher
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STONEBURNER, Judge.
Appellant David Schumacher challenges the district court’s grant of summary judgment to respondent Harold Schumacher, claiming that the district court erred in ruling that the Iowa Domesticated Animal Activities Immunity Statute applies to this negligence action to relieve respondent from liability for injuries appellant sustained when respondent’s horse kicked him in the face. Appellant argues that Minnesota law applies and, alternatively, that even if the Iowa law applies, there is a genuine issue of material fact regarding whether respondent’s conduct was…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Fabio v. BellomoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- DLH, Inc. v. RussSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- Jepson v. General Casualty Co. of WisconsinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
- Myers v. Government Employees Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- In re Grand Theft Auto Video Game Consumer LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- Christian v. BirchCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
- Kolberg-Pioneer, Inc. v. Belgrade Steel Tank Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
- Schmelzle Ex Rel. Schmelzle v. Alza Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2008
- Frankle v. Best Buy Stores, L.P.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2009
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.