State v. Neill
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtDenny, J.
The question presented for determination on this appeal is whether or not the court committed error in overruling the defendants’ motion for judgment as of nonsuit on the third count, which charges the defendants with receiving stolen goods, knowing them to have been stolen.
The crimes of larceny and receiving stolen goods, knowing them to have been stolen, are separate and distinct offenses and not degrees of the same offense. S. v. Brady, 237 N.C. 675, 75 S.E. 2d 791; In re Powell, 241 N.C. 288, 84 S.E. 2d 906. However, receiving stolen goods is a “sort of secondary crime based upon a prior…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- State v. BradySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- State v. . OxendineSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- State v. . RecordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
- State v. Hullen.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
- State v. . NevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- State v. PerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- State v. PattersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. JacksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- State v. MuseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. AllisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.