Legal Opinion

State v. . Record

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 11, 1909PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Appeal by defendant from Long, J., July Term, 1909, of RANDOLPH. Tbe facts are stated in tbe opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtOlaeK, C. J.

Indictment for larceny and receiving. There was a general verdict of guilty. Tbe defendant’s bouse was searched, and some of tbe stolen clothing were found banging on tbe wall in tbe defendant’s bed-room. His wife said they were her husband’s clothes. Tbe witness said that “tbe defendant was twenty feet outside door, in bearing distance.” Tbe defendant’s exceptions cannot be sustained. Although tbe wife is not a competent witness against tbe husband in tbe trial of a criminal action, her declarations, made in bis presence, are competent.

In People v. McRea, 32 Cal., 100, the Court says:…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. McCreaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
  2. State v. . BowmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879
  3. Richards v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1892
  4. State v. . GravesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1875
  5. State v. Hullen.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Kasle v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1916
  2. State v. . HolbrookSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  3. State v. NeillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  4. State v. . RandallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  5. State v. . WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API