State v. Perry
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
*228MEYER, Justice.
The State’s appeal sets forth two issues: (I) whether the Court of Appeals erred in vacating the felonious larceny conviction and directing entry of a judgment based upon misdemeanor larceny, and (II) whether the Court of Appeals erred in vacating the possession conviction and ordering the charge dismissed because of double jeopardy considerations.
(I)
In support of its contention that the Court of Appeals erred in reducing the felonious larceny conviction to a misdemeanor, the State argues that G.S. § 14-72 will support the interpretation that a defendant can be found guilty of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Albernaz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- State v. CameronSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- Jolly v. WrightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- David v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by133 opinions
- State v. GardnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- State v. EtheridgeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
- State v. MumfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2010
- State v. FernandezSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1997
- State v. MurraySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
128 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.