Legal Opinion

State v. Muse

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 15, 1971No. 88PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRANCH, Justice.

Defendant’s principal assignment of error is that the trial court erred in its voir dire findings and in allowing into evidence incriminating statements made by defendant.

When the State called SBI Agent O. L. Wise as a witness, he testified that he had had a conversation with defendant. Upon objection, the trial judge excused the jury and held a voir dire hearing.

Agent Wise testified on voir dire that he made several visits to defendant’s jail cell during the period from 12 June 1969 to 15 July 1969. Each visit was made pursuant to a request by defendant. Defendant asked his…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  3. State v. FletcherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  4. State v. BruceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  5. State v. . RobertsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1827

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. State v. PerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  2. State v. BranchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  3. State v. DietzSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  4. State v. RevelleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  5. State v. SimmonsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API