State v. . Oxendine
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Stacy, O. J.
The question for decision is whether the eases as made can survive the demurrers. Specifically, the question posed is whether the evidence warrants the finding that each of the defendants, with felonious intent, received the respective articles of merchandise, the property of Leo Smith, knowing at the time that the same had been feloniously stolen or taken in violation of C. S., 4250. S. v. Miller, 212 N. C., 361, 193 S. E., 388; S. v. Dail, 191 N. C., 231, 131 S. E., 573; S. v. Caveness, 78 N. C., 484. We are disposed to think the element of scienter is wanting. S. v. Spaulding,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- State v. . MasseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882
- State v. . PrinceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
- Birdsong v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- State v. . WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
- State v. . MontagueSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Stull v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1959
- State v. PhillipsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- State v. . HarveySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
- State v. . ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
- State v. FearingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.